<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WinFixer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.411-spyware.com/remove-winfixer/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.411-spyware.com/remove-winfixer</link>
	<description>411-Spyware.com</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: EveryFixer</title>
		<link>http://www.411-spyware.com/remove-winfixer#comment-30792</link>
		<dc:creator>EveryFixer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://411-spyware.com/remove-winfixer#comment-30792</guid>
		<description>I came to conclusion that WinFixer is relatively harmless itself, but it clearly shows the state of PC security. Since it exploits vulnerabilities in MS Internet Explorer, I always recommend to all who fell victim 
to winfixer, to switch to Firefox. Also, some kind of active antispyware protection is badly needed, though lots of unknown antispyware programs never detect none of the malware variants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came to conclusion that WinFixer is relatively harmless itself, but it clearly shows the state of PC security. Since it exploits vulnerabilities in MS Internet Explorer, I always recommend to all who fell victim<br />
to winfixer, to switch to Firefox. Also, some kind of active antispyware protection is badly needed, though lots of unknown antispyware programs never detect none of the malware variants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
